Scrutiny state palette review

The examples reproduce the compact Mandatory/Further Scrutiny node grammar: human decision controls the fill; the original AI finding remains on the border. Use the vision controls to compare the state pairs.

Current findingThe present pale emerald/red fills are only 1.04:1 apart; their borders are 1.13:1 apart. Labels and icons rescue comprehension, but colour itself does not.
Preview vision Approximate browser simulation; final selection still needs a real CVD/user check.
Decision pattern Fill is the present human decision; border is the original AI finding.
Do not rely on hueKeep the Y/N/NA mark, check/cross controls, and exact Compliant/Not compliant copy. Those are the primary accessible signals.
Border must surviveBecause the border preserves the AI finding, it needs more than Tailwind 200 weight. A 2–3px line plus solid/dashed form remains legible at laptop scale.
Recommended directionOption B preserves court semantics and the jhana green while adding luminance and line-style redundancy. Option C is the strongest hue-only comparison, but breaks the product colour contract.

Internal temporary review surface · no production frontend build · no court or case data.